In many parts of the world, 
leprosy and tuberculosis live side-by-side. Worldwide there are 
approximately 233,000 new cases of leprosy per year, with nearly all of 
them occurring where tuberculosis is endemic.
The
 currently available century-old vaccine Bacille Calmette-Guerin, or 
BCG, provides only partial protection against both tuberculosis and 
leprosy, so a more potent vaccine is needed to combat both diseases. 
UCLA-led research may have found a stronger weapon against both 
diseases.
In a study published in Infection and Immunity,
 the researchers found that rBCG30, a recombinant variant of BCG that 
overexpresses a highly abundant 30 kDa protein of the tuberculosis 
bacterium known as Antigen 85B, is superior to BCG in protecting against
 tuberculosis in animal models, and also cross protects against leprosy.
 In addition, they found that boosting rBCG30 with the Antigen 85B 
protein, a protein also expressed by the leprosy bacillus, provides 
considerably stronger protection against leprosy.
“This is the first study demonstrating that an improved vaccine against tuberculosis also offers cross-protection against Mycobacterium leprae,
 the causative agent of leprosy,” said Dr. Marcus Horwitz, professor of 
medicine and microbiology, immunology and molecular genetics, and the 
study’s senior author. “That means that this vaccine has promise for 
better protecting against both major diseases at the same time.
“It
 is also the first study demonstrating that boosting a recombinant BCG 
vaccine further improves cross-protection against leprosy,” he added.
In
 one experiment, mice were immunized with either rBCG30 or the old BCG 
vaccine, or they were given a salt solution. Ten weeks later, the mice 
were injected with live leprosy bacteria into their footpads and seven 
months after that, the number of leprosy bacteria in their footpads was 
measured. The researchers found that the mice given BCG or rBCG30 had 
much fewer leprosy bacteria in their footpads than the mice given the 
salt solution. Additionally, mice immunized with rBCG30 had 
significantly fewer leprosy bacteria than those vaccinated with BCG.
In
 a second experiment, the mice were first immunized with BCG or rBCG30, 
and then immunized with a booster vaccine (r30) consisting of the TB 
bacterium’s 30-kDa Antigen 85B protein in adjuvant — that is, in a 
chemical formulation that enhances the immune response. The group of 
mice immunized with rBCG30 and boosted with r30 had no detectable 
leprosy bacteria in their footpads, in contrast to groups of mice 
immunized with all other vaccines tested, including BCG and rBCG30 alone
 and BCG boosted with r30.
In other experiments, 
the immune responses of the mice were measured after vaccination. Mice 
immunized with rBCG30 and boosted with r30 had markedly enhanced immune 
responses to the leprosy bacterium’s version of the Antigen 85B protein,
 which is very similar to the one expressed by the tuberculosis 
bacillus, compared with mice immunized with the other vaccines and 
vaccine combinations.
A Phase 1 human trial for 
rBCG30 has proven that it is safe and significantly more effective than 
BCG, and it is the only candidate replacement vaccine for BCG tested 
thus far to satisfy both of these key clinical criteria. Horwitz noted 
that this most recent study, however, was conducted in an animal model 
of leprosy, so further study is needed to gauge the effectiveness of the
 rBCG30 vaccine in protecting against leprosy in humans.
The
 next step in the research will be to test the rBCG30 vaccine for 
efficacy in humans against TB.  If it’s effective against TB, then the 
next step would be to test its effectiveness in humans against leprosy.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق